Prosecutors argued there were two: that Malvo posed a future danger and that

Posted by admin

Prosecutors argued there were two: that Malvo posed a future danger and that his crimes were "outrageously or wantonly vile". "It was mentally challenging and emotionally exhausting," he said. "Once it has been cast, it has no ability to temper its impact. The [prosecution] urges you to vote to kill, to stain your stone with the blood of this child."Many observers believed the jury of eight women and four men might spare Malvo's life given his age. Some suggested that the time of year - something mentioned by Malvo's lawyer - may also have had some impact on yesterday's decision.The jury's chairman, Jim Wolcafe, said that "deep consideration" had gone into their decision. When they commit evil acts, you can almost always trace the acts to the evil that has been performed against them," he said.During his appeal to the jury, Mr Cooley held up a large stone as a prop, telling the jury that in times past the jury itself would hurl the stones at the defendant."The stone has no compassion," he said.

The Virginia prosecutor, Robert Horan, said the killings were part of a scheme to extort $10m (£5.6m) from the government and that Malvo pulled the trigger in most, if not all, of the shootings. He rejected suggestions that Malvo had been brainwashed by his older accomplice, John Muhammad, who was convicted of murder last month and is awaiting sentence."They were an unholy team, as vicious, as brutal and as uncaring as you can be," he said "You can talk about John Muhammad all you want Maybe it was his plan Maybe it was his idea But the evidence stamps this defendant as the shooter .. He did it. Not John Muhammad."But Craig Cooley, for the defence, argued that Malvo, who was born in Jamaica, had been heavily influenced by Muhammad, whom he came to consider a father figure "Children are not born evil. He was also convicted under a new terrorism-related statute drawn up after the attacks of 11 September 2001.During the sentencing phase, prosecutors had argued that the death penalty was the only appropriate sentence for Malvo given the extent of his involvement in the shootings. Malvo - who sat expressionless as the decision was announced - will never be eligible for parole.But that may not be Malvo's fate. At least two other authorities have indicated their intention to try the teenager for capital murder over the shootings, which were carried out over three weeks in the autumn of 2002. Malvo, who had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, could also appeal against his conviction.Malvo was convicted last week of the murder of Linda Franklin, an FBI analyst who was shot dead outside a DIY store.

I am surprised that Donald Rumsfeld does not resign right now.". The teenage sniper who terrorised the Washington area with an older accomplice was spared the death penalty yesterday when a jury sentenced him instead to life imprisonment - apparently persuaded that he was an impressionable boy who had fallen under the spell of a charismatic but twisted mentor. In 1987-88 American warships destroyed Iranian oil platforms in the Gulf and broke the blockade of Iraqi shipping lanes.Tom Blanton, the director of the National Security Archive, a non-profit group that obtained the documents, told The New York Times: "Saddam had chemical weapons in the 1980s and it didn't make any difference to US policy. The embrace of Saddam and what it emboldened him to do should caution us as Americans that we have to look closely at all our murky alliances."Last night, Danny Muller, a spokesman for the anti-war group Voices in the Wilderness, said the documents revealed America's "blatant hypocrisy" He added: "This is not an isolated event Continuing administrations have said 'we will do business'. When news of this visit was revealed last year, Mr Rumsfeld claimed he had "cautioned" Saddam to stop using chemical weapons.When documents about the meeting disclosed he had said no such thing, a spokesman for Mr Rumsfeld said he had raised the issue with Mr Aziz.America's relationship with Iraq at a time when Saddam was using chemical weapons is well-documented but rarely reported.During the war with Iran, America provided combat assistance to Iraq that included intelligence on Iranian deployments and bomb-damage assessments. No one from Mr Rumsfeld's office was available to comment yesterday.It was not Mr Rumsfeld's first visit to Iraq. Four months earlier, in December 1983, he had visited Saddam and was photographed shaking hands with the dictator.

Comments are closed.

Next Articles

Pages

Categories